i3 2100 watt

相關問題 & 資訊整理

i3 2100 watt

Performance per Watt ... Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i3 2100 ... The Core i3-2100 is loaded with 3MB of cache, as well as Intel HD Graphics ... , For these weekend tests are raw performance and performance-per-Watt metrics for the Core i3 2100 Sandy Bridge to the Core i3 7100 ...,We put the 3.1 GHz 2100 to the test against the 1.55 GHz A4 5000 to find out which ... per watt, 13.96 pt/W, vs, 1.41 pt/W, Around 10x better performance per watt. ,CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Core i3 2100 vs E1 2100 among all CPUs .... per watt, 16.09 pt/W, vs, 1.41 pt/W, Around 11.5x better performance per watt. , 200. Watts, lower is better ... Intel Core i3-2100 (3.1GHz); Intel Core i5-2400 (3.1GHz); Intel Core i5-760 (2.8GHz); Intel Core i5-2500K (3.3GHz) ...,We put the 3.1 GHz Intel 2400 to the test against the 3.1 GHz 2100 to find out which you should buy. ... Front view of Intel Core i3 2100 ... Performance per Watt ... ,Intel® Core™ i3-2100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.10 GHz) quick reference guide ... 3.10 GHz; Cache 3 MB SmartCache; Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI; TDP 65 W ... ,Intel® Core™ i3-2100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.10 GHz) 快速參考指南,包括規格、 ... 3.10 GHz; 快取記憶體 3 MB SmartCache; 匯流排速度 5 GT/s DMI; TDP 65 W ... ,Typical TDP: 65 W Other names: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz. CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2011 CPUmark/$Price: 61.53 Overall Rank: 1073 , That's AWFULLY low wattage. I know those are low power components, but even without looking up the parts and figuring the expected usage ...

相關軟體 Intel Graphics Driver (32-bit) 資訊

Intel Graphics Driver (32-bit)
英特爾圖形驅動程序是一個免費的軟件下提供的驅動程序,由英特爾為 Windows 提供。這些軟件驅動程序是通用版本,可用於一般目的。但是,計算機原始設備製造商(OEM)可能已經改變了它們提供的軟件或軟件包的功能,合併的定製或其他更改。為避免您的 OEM 系統出現任何潛在的安裝不兼容問題,英特爾建議您檢查您的 OEM 並使用系統製造商提供的軟件。下載英特爾圖形驅動程序 32 位最新的驅動程序為您的 W... Intel Graphics Driver (32-bit) 軟體介紹

i3 2100 watt 相關參考資料
Intel Core i3 2100 - CPUBoss

Performance per Watt ... Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i3 2100 ... The Core i3-2100 is loaded with 3MB of cache, as well as Intel HD Graphics ...

http://cpuboss.com

Intel Core i3 2100 Sandy Bridge vs. Core i3 7100 Kabylake - Phoronix

For these weekend tests are raw performance and performance-per-Watt metrics for the Core i3 2100 Sandy Bridge to the Core i3 7100 ...

https://www.phoronix.com

Intel Core i3 2100 vs AMD A4 5000 - CPUBoss

We put the 3.1 GHz 2100 to the test against the 1.55 GHz A4 5000 to find out which ... per watt, 13.96 pt/W, vs, 1.41 pt/W, Around 10x better performance per watt.

http://cpuboss.com

Intel Core i3 2100 vs AMD E1 2100 - CPUBoss

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Core i3 2100 vs E1 2100 among all CPUs .... per watt, 16.09 pt/W, vs, 1.41 pt/W, Around 11.5x better performance per watt.

http://cpuboss.com

Intel Core i3-2100 Review | bit-tech.net

200. Watts, lower is better ... Intel Core i3-2100 (3.1GHz); Intel Core i5-2400 (3.1GHz); Intel Core i5-760 (2.8GHz); Intel Core i5-2500K (3.3GHz) ...

https://bit-tech.net

Intel Core i5 2400 vs i3 2100 - CPUBoss

We put the 3.1 GHz Intel 2400 to the test against the 3.1 GHz 2100 to find out which you should buy. ... Front view of Intel Core i3 2100 ... Performance per Watt ...

http://cpuboss.com

Intel® Core™ i3-2100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.10 GHz) Product ...

Intel® Core™ i3-2100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.10 GHz) quick reference guide ... 3.10 GHz; Cache 3 MB SmartCache; Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI; TDP 65 W ...

https://ark.intel.com

Intel® Core™ i3-2100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.10 GHz) 產品規格

Intel® Core™ i3-2100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.10 GHz) 快速參考指南,包括規格、 ... 3.10 GHz; 快取記憶體 3 MB SmartCache; 匯流排速度 5 GT/s DMI; TDP 65 W ...

https://ark.intel.com

PassMark - Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz - Price performance ...

Typical TDP: 65 W Other names: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz. CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2011 CPUmark/$Price: 61.53 Overall Rank: 1073

https://www.cpubenchmark.net

ssd - Core i3-2100 with 65W power supply? - Super User

That's AWFULLY low wattage. I know those are low power components, but even without looking up the parts and figuring the expected usage ...

https://superuser.com