gitk show all branches
Edit (More explanation): The --decorate looks through all the refs (all tags and tips of branches, both locally and on remotes) to see if any of them point to the ... ,To control which revisions to show, gitk supports most options applicable to the git ... See git-rev-list[1] for a complete list. --all. Show all refs (branches, tags, etc.). ,To control which revisions to show, gitk supports most options applicable to the git ... See git-rev-list[1] for a complete list. --all. Show all refs (branches, tags, etc.). , The --branches= switch would be used if you want to see all branches that are, for example, named fix/* : gitk --branches=fix/*. would show you ..., gitk --all without path specification gives the expected result, exactly as gitg; It seems that gitk <some path> completely ignores --all switch and ..., gitk takes rev-list options, so you can e.g. gitk --remotes=origin.,Go to View -> New View... (Or press Shift-F4); In the dialog that appears, give the "View Name" something meaningful like "Local Branches"; Check "All (local) ... , Thus I don't want to use gitk --all . However, I do like to view other things like my local branches, which I can do with gitk --branches . Is there a ...,Hi All. I find that if I do the following: stash branch br, switch back to master, modify master, then switch back to branch br stash apply. gitk only shows branch x ... , Gitk by default only shows you the branch you are on. It seems that when you launched gitk, your current branch was experiment. Therefore ...
| 相關軟體 GitHub Desktop 資訊 | |
|---|---|
 gitk show all branches 相關參考資料
Cannot see upstream branches in git log or gitk - Stack Overflow
Edit (More explanation): The --decorate looks through all the refs (all tags and tips of branches, both locally and on remotes) to see if any of them point to the ... https://stackoverflow.com Git - gitk Documentation
To control which revisions to show, gitk supports most options applicable to the git ... See git-rev-list[1] for a complete list. --all. Show all refs (branches, tags, etc.). https://git-scm.com Git - gitk Documentation - Git SCM
To control which revisions to show, gitk supports most options applicable to the git ... See git-rev-list[1] for a complete list. --all. Show all refs (branches, tags, etc.). https://git-scm.com gitk display only specified branches - Stack Overflow
The --branches= switch would be used if you want to see all branches that are, for example, named fix/* : gitk --branches=fix/*. would show you ... https://stackoverflow.com Gitk does not show HEAD of master? - Stack Overflow
gitk --all without path specification gives the expected result, exactly as gitg; It seems that gitk <some path> completely ignores --all switch and ... https://stackoverflow.com How to git log of all branches of a remote? - Stack Overflow
gitk takes rev-list options, so you can e.g. gitk --remotes=origin. https://stackoverflow.com How to make gitk show only local branches? - Stack Overflow
Go to View -> New View... (Or press Shift-F4); In the dialog that appears, give the "View Name" something meaningful like "Local Branches"; Check "All (local) ... https://stackoverflow.com How to show stashes in gitk without `--all` option? - Stack Overflow
Thus I don't want to use gitk --all . However, I do like to view other things like my local branches, which I can do with gitk --branches . Is there a ... https://stackoverflow.com Should gitk show all branches? - Google Groups
Hi All. I find that if I do the following: stash branch br, switch back to master, modify master, then switch back to branch br stash apply. gitk only shows branch x ... https://groups.google.com Why is gitk not showing my local branch? - Stack Overflow
Gitk by default only shows you the branch you are on. It seems that when you launched gitk, your current branch was experiment. Therefore ... https://stackoverflow.com |