bx300 vs mx300
After the BX200 took the budget SSD market by storm, the performance expectations for the follow up BX300 are sky high. But can it compete in a cluttered market?,Top ⭐ 36 razones para Crucial BX300 480GB vs Crucial MX300 525GB: 1. Velocidad de lectura secuencial: 555 vs 530 2. Velocidad de escritura secuencial: 510 vs 510. , The only 'real' issue is that buyers will 'only' be getting 240GB (vs 275GB) or 480GB (vs 525GB) when they opt for this MLC based model instead of the cheaper TLC based MX300. We have a hunch that many will be willing to make this sacrifi,Die Crucial MX300 Oberklasse SSD gegen die Crucial BX300 "Billig"-SSD ? Ist das ein fairer Kampf ... ,http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crucial-bx300-ssd,5182.html http://www.anandtech.com/show/11766 評測已經出來了先說用戶會比較在意的 ... (奇怪的是MX300還是自家的3D TLC NAND) 性能表現和售價也是不錯尤其是在某些入門產品除了TLC NAND以外連DRAMless方案都採用的情況下BX300的配置 ... ,Solved: Hi What is the difference between MX300 and new BX300 series? I wanted to order a SSD for my XPS Dell laptop with a capacity around 500 GB... , The BX300 may turn out to be a short-lived stopgap product to go after a segment of the market that the MX300 is ill-suited for. A replacement for both the MX300 and BX300 using 64L TLC will probably show up as soon as Micron can spare the NAND. Certainl,The 275GB Crucial MX300 supersedes the MX200. Unlike its predecessor, the MX300 is TLC based and therefore suffers from weak write speeds in comparison to MLC drives. The MX300 utilises a sophisticated algorithm to enable fast burst write speeds provided ,The BX300 is one of the faster consumer SSDs available, with a 2% performance improvement over Crucial's older MLC based MX200 and a 25% performance improvement over the TLC based MX300 which are both from Crucial's more expensive MX product line.,Based on 17573 user benchmarks for the Crucial BX300 and the MX300, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 940 SSDs.
| 相關軟體 AIDA64 Extreme Edition 資訊 | |
|---|---|
 bx300 vs mx300 相關參考資料
bx300 vs mx300 | Hardware Canucks
After the BX200 took the budget SSD market by storm, the performance expectations for the follow up BX300 are sky high. But can it compete in a cluttered market? http://www.hardwarecanucks.com Crucial BX300 480GB vs Crucial MX300 525GB | Comparación de SSD
Top ⭐ 36 razones para Crucial BX300 480GB vs Crucial MX300 525GB: 1. Velocidad de lectura secuencial: 555 vs 530 2. Velocidad de escritura secuencial: 510 vs 510. https://versus.com Crucial BX300: Not your typical budget SSD - Real Hardware Reviews
The only 'real' issue is that buyers will 'only' be getting 240GB (vs 275GB) or 480GB (vs 525GB) when they opt for this MLC based model instead of the cheaper TLC based MX300. We have... https://www.realhardwarereview DIE BESTE GAMER-SSD ? Crucial BX300 VS Crucial MX300 - YouTube
Die Crucial MX300 Oberklasse SSD gegen die Crucial BX300 "Billig"-SSD ? Ist das ein fairer Kampf ... https://www.youtube.com Re: [情報] 美光全新平價SSD BX300 登場- 看板PC_Shopping - 批踢踢實業坊
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crucial-bx300-ssd,5182.html http://www.anandtech.com/show/11766 評測已經出來了先說用戶會比較在意的 ... (奇怪的是MX300還是自家的3D TLC NAND) 性能表現和售價也是不錯尤其是在某些入門產品除了TLC NAND以外連DRAMless方案都採用的情況... https://www.ptt.cc Solved: Difference between MX300 and new BX300 series - Crucial ...
Solved: Hi What is the difference between MX300 and new BX300 series? I wanted to order a SSD for my XPS Dell laptop with a capacity around 500 GB... http://forums.crucial.com The Crucial BX300 (480GB) SSD Review: Back To MLC - AnandTech
The BX300 may turn out to be a short-lived stopgap product to go after a segment of the market that the MX300 is ill-suited for. A replacement for both the MX300 and BX300 using 64L TLC will probably... https://www.anandtech.com UserBenchmark: Crucial BX200 vs MX300
The 275GB Crucial MX300 supersedes the MX200. Unlike its predecessor, the MX300 is TLC based and therefore suffers from weak write speeds in comparison to MLC drives. The MX300 utilises a sophisticate... http://ssd.userbenchmark.com UserBenchmark: Crucial BX300 vs MX200
The BX300 is one of the faster consumer SSDs available, with a 2% performance improvement over Crucial's older MLC based MX200 and a 25% performance improvement over the TLC based MX300 which are ... http://ssd.userbenchmark.com UserBenchmark: Crucial BX300 vs MX300
Based on 17573 user benchmarks for the Crucial BX300 and the MX300, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 940 SSDs. http://ssd.userbenchmark.com |